Criterion – 2

Criterion - 2

Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

Metric No.

Description

Weightage

2.1.1

Enrolment percentage

1. Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure
2. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
3. Final admission list as published by the HEI and endorsed by the competent authority
4. Document relating to sanction of intake as approved by competent authority

10

2.1.2

Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for
the first year admission during the last five years

1. Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure
2. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)
3. Final admission list indicating the category as published by the HEI and endorsed by the competent authority
4. Copy of the letter issued by the State govt. or Central Government Indicating the reserved categories(SC, ST, OBC,Divyangjan, etc.) to be considered as per the state rule (Translated copy in English to be provided as applicable)

10

Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.2.1	The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student 1. Upload Any additional information 2. Provide link for additional information	15
2.2.2	Student – Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any). 2. List showing the number of students in each of the programs for the latest completed academic year across all semesters. 3. Certified list of full time teachers along with the departmental affiliation in the latest completed academic year.	15

Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.3.1	Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process 1. Upload Any additional information 2. Provide link for additional information	30
2.3.2	The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues 1. Upload Any additional information 2. Provide link for additional information 3. List of Active mentors	10
2.3.3	Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution 1. Upload Any additional information 2. Provide link for additional information	10

Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.4.1	Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years 1. Sanction letters indicating number of posts sanctioned by the competent authority (including Management sanctioned posts) 2. Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure 3. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)	15
2.4.2	Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. / D.Sc. / D.Litt. / L.L.D during the last five years 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any). 2. List of faculty having Ph.D. / D.Sc. / D.Litt. / L.L.D along with particulars of the degree awarding university, subject and the year of award per academic year. 3. Copies of Ph.D. / D.Sc. / D.Litt. / L.L.D awarded by UGC recognized universities.	25
2.4.3	Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years) 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)	5
2.4.4	Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution throughout during the last five years 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)	5

Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.5.1	Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year-end examination till the last date of declaration of results during the last five years 1. Result Sheet with date of publication 2. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 3. Policy document on Declaration of results (if any) 4. Exam timetable released by the Controller of Examination	20
2.5.2	Percentage of student complaints / grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 2. List of students who have applied for re-valuation / re-totaling program wise certified by the Controller of Examinations year-wise for the assessment period	15
2.5.3	IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) / Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution 1. Upload any additional information 2. Provide links as Additional Information	15

Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.6.1	The institution has stated learning outcomes (programme and course outcome) / graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution 1. Upload POs and COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary) 2. Upload any additional information 3. Provide links as Additional Information	30
2.6.2	Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for the latest completed academic year) 1. Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any). 2. Certified report from the COE indicating the pass percentage of students of the final year (final semester) eligible for the degree program-wise / year wise 3. Annual report of Controller of Examinations (COE) highlighting the pass percentage of final year students	20

Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

Metric No.	Description	Weightage
2.7.1	Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process	50